CNC – Collision avoidance or collision detection?

For 5-axis applications not only does the CADCAM software have to consider actual collisions with the tool and the tool holder, but also the kinematics of the machine tool itself. For 3-axis machining the concern is mainly the tool length and holder ensuring that it can get into each part of the job without a collision.

For systems with just collision detection, the software tells the user that there is a problem and where the problem is, but the user then has to work out what needs to be done to get over the problem for himself. In some cases this can be very complex and requires detailed investigation of the surface topology of the part.

With CNC software such as WorkNC, users can generate the collided and uncollided toolpaths and get information about the minimum tool length required to finish the job. With this information engineers can cut as much of the part as possible with short rigid cutters and restrict to a minimum, machining with long tools. Best of all, the software does all the calculation for you, so that you can be sure of a reliable, safe and optimized result.

One of the benefits of 5-axis machining is being able to cut much more of the job in one setting with the shortest possible tools, minimizing resetting and secondary operations. If the CAM software just pinpoints where there is a problem, which it will do with collision detection, it is likely that the whole toolpath will need to be recalculated after the problem has been resolved. Producing a useable toolpath this way could take several attempts so at the very least it will be time consuming and tedious. With collision avoidance, the software goes a stage further as it anticipates potential problems as you are programming. Again giving the uncollided toolpath and inserting flip and unwind movements where the axis limits of the machine have been reached.

Having intelligence within the CAM software that provides a solution to potential problems as they occur has got to be a lot better than just letting the user know that a problem exists.

Antonius Köster, who uses WorkNC Auto 5 in Germany, gave this example of one of the problems resolved with collision avoidance. “For an aerospace supplier from the Black Forest, we machined a component which required the tool holder to move inside the part through a drilled hole so that we could mill a pocket at the bottom. Not only was the cutter moving inside the part, but the whole tool holder. This was a really challenging task.”

Working with lots of different CAD systems

Working with lots of different CAD systems – for subcontractors and suppliers this can be a real headache and especially if you are working with automotive or aerospace customers that use some of the high-end CAD packages.

In some cases there is no alternative to actually installing one of these CAD systems and employing a very expensive design engineer to run it, which can be justified if the majority your work is in the one market sector and you have to actively participate in the customer’s design process.

Thankfully for most people, CAD translation has moved on enough to make this unnecessary. For CAM systems neutral formats such as IGES and STEP or direct translators for products like CATIA, SolidWorks and Inventor are very reliable, enabling manufacturers to accept data from many different sources without a problem.

Once you have accepted that translators are OK, you can then choose the best CAM system for your application. Even if you have had to install the high-end CAD, transfer of model data is generally one way into the CAM system, so even for these applications a specialist, best of breed, CAM package will provide the best solution, reducing cycle times, improving quality and reducing tool breakage – real tangible savings.

Supply chain collaboration

More and more industries are following the lead of the automotive and aerospace sectors and working very closely with suppliers to achieve consistent high quality, competitive prices, reliable delivery and innovative design. Automotive companies have some very sophisticated communication software to share design data and maintain it at the correct release level, so that the right version of the product is being manufactured. When you consider how many parts go into a car, the design iterations, and the different models of each vehicle, not to mention the spare parts market, it is easy to understand how complex this can be.

On a smaller scale, every company can make use of this type of technology with CAD viewing and analysis software, such as WorkXPlore 3D. Low cost and free versions of this exist, making it practical and cost effective to share design data with many more people inside a company and throughout its supply chain.

It is well known that the largest costs associated with a new product come once the first parts or prototypes are manufactured. Getting the design right before this stage is reached clearly makes a lot of sense. By sharing data, potential problems can be spotted early, new ideas can be incorporated, and cost implications of different design options accurately assessed. Not only does this help to get the product right first time, but it helps to keep costs down, optimizes the design and helps manufacturers get products to market earlier. Not bad for low cost and free!